Page 2 of 6

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 10:06 am
by Serinde
I remember watching the launch with my step-grandmother (tho I always forgot the "step" part), who commented that she never thought she'd live to see this day because when she was my age, it was still the era of horse and buggy. This is the same woman who went to university to study sciences, carrying her two dresses in her suitcase. What a woman!

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:04 pm
by Mabel Figworthy
Ahhhh Blake's 7! And particularly Avon! (And wobbly sets...)

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 4:20 pm
by richardandtracy
Serinde wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 10:06 am I remember watching the launch with my step-grandmother (tho I always forgot the "step" part), who commented that she never thought she'd live to see this day because when she was my age, it was still the era of horse and buggy. This is the same woman who went to university to study sciences, carrying her two dresses in her suitcase. What a woman!
My grandmother was a History teacher having been in the first cohort of women to get degrees in the University of London in (I think) 1912. My grandmother got the degree despite being prevented from attending any lecture or seminar, and while financing herself during that time as a teacher she actually taught my other grandmother - as they found out in 1960 after my parents were married when they met for the 'first' time. Even more remarkable being the fact that she taught in S London despite growing up in a mining town in Cornwall. Anyway, in the late 1940's in her school in Exeter, my Grandmother was laughed at when she said that she expected that men would walk on the moon in the lifetime of her students. It actually happened 20 years before the end of her lifetime...

Regards,

Richard.

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 3:37 pm
by Roland
Came across this, and I had to share.

Image

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 4:04 pm
by Serinde
So far, they've made it to the end of their yard, and have found rocks

That's my favourite bit. (With the added alien point: will this discourage them? Eh, nah. But they might throw rocks at one another.)

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2024 10:07 am
by Mabel Figworthy
Image

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2024 10:30 am
by richardandtracy
:whoop:
Love it.

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2024 11:59 am
by Serinde
Oh, Mabel, that's a bit close to home for me!!

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2024 9:37 am
by Mabel Figworthy
Shared by a friend and fellow-pedant this morning:

Image

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 7:51 am
by Serinde
Yup. Pesky apostrophes.

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 9:09 am
by richardandtracy
@rotfl:
Eldest daughter has had exactly the same problem on a Star Trek fandom site, much to her mortification..

Regards.

Richard

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 10:40 am
by Mabel Figworthy
That's hilarious Richard, I hadn't thought it would happen in real life! Poor her though, she must have felt very uncomfortable about being misunderstood.

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 12:45 pm
by richardandtracy
She's also a very strong proponent of the Oxford comma, and the Thorn character (a bit like a Greek Theta) to be used instead of 'th' in words like 'the', 'their' etc. Oh yes, she also has her own views on the formality or otherwise of 'Thee' and 'you' in late mediaeval English. I wish I'd had time to listen, but was cooking at the time..

But Enya's 'done history', and specialized in early mediaeval history for her Masters degree, where the Thorn character and many other oddities were in use in a lot of writing. The biggest problem she finds with reading Anglo Saxon based Old English appears to be the handwriting rather than the language. As a near monoglot speaker of English, I find this astonishing. I have tried to read Beowulf, but it was just out of grasp, felt I should have understood it, but couldn't quite. I struggled through, taking aid from a century old translation into 19th Century English by a professor at the University of Paderborn in Germany, but eventually gave up. Then Chaucer, his writing seemed to be just on the other side of the comprehensibility divide as the language evolved a little closer to the current iteration of English. Strange world we live in.

Regards,

Richard

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 1:42 pm
by Mabel Figworthy
I did enjoy Old English, sometimes it was like a puzzle trying to work it out :-) I'm by no means a fluent reader but I occasionally try and struggle through bits of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (an intriguing work) to keep up what knowledge I have of it. Yes, "you" was the more formal variant even though "thou" sounds much more formal to us nowadays.

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:11 am
by fccs
I'm a fan of the Oxford comma as well. :-)

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 9:05 am
by Serinde
As an editor of books, I HATE the Oxford comma. Pretentious and old-fashioned thing, and generally unnecessary for sense. But I dutifully include it when working for OUP or an American publisher. Grrr.

Scots language used a thorn symbol for quite a while after being dropped in English. I always felt that Chaucer and Shakespeare are so much more comprehensible when read out loud, but Beowulf was one step beyond. But then, my period was the 14th century, mostly -- a very curious time. I absolutely loved palaeography!

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2024 9:17 pm
by richardandtracy
https://cheezburger.com/9874361344/good-luck
Bath time... [snigger]

Regards,

Richard

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:11 am
by fccs
Oh my, I can only imagine!

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 8:33 am
by Serinde
Image

Re: 2024 The Smile for Today

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 10:01 am
by richardandtracy
Frighteningly true..!

Regards,

Richard